Religion of Tuesday, 5 December 2006

Source: Anonymous

Feature: On Things Religion

Fellow Africans,



We promised to write on christianity and that is exactly what we are going

to do. The following is the first part in a long series of articles on what

is called the Christian religion. The purpose is not to attack any

particular religion or theological beliefs of any people or group of people.

We endeavor only to shed light on this thing (christianity) which is being

used to sentence a lot of Africans into life-long mental prison.



As we write this, millions of what the christian called a Holy Book, the

Christian Bible is on its way to Africa. They are being giving away free of

charge. Why? You may ask. Why would Euro-Americans be wasting money and time

giving things away FOC - Free Of Charge. You and I live in this society, do

you ever receive something for nothing?



The Bible is being used to turn our eyes to some phantoms and goblins of the

sky while Euro-Americans are LOOTING our resources. While they are telling

us to wait for our paradise in some afterlife, they are gorging themselves

with the loot from our land. Jomo Kenyatta, I believe it was who said that



"When the Europeans came, the Africans have the land, the Europeans

have the bible. 'Close your eyes and let's pray to our father in heaven,'

the Europeans asked of the gullible Africans. When the Africans opened their

eyes, they were having the Bible, and the Europeans were having the land."



It took a protracted 'Mau-Mau' war to forced the Bible-wielding, god-fearing

'men-of-god' to divulge of their ill-gotten wealth.



In the coming series we shall touch on a lot of things which western

scholars\leaders would rather not discuss. If some of the things we talk

about appear unimaginable or fantastic, the veil of secrecy and ignorance

serves the purpose of obscuring a lot of facts, which will be unpalatable to

those who make their good living by pretending to stand between our fear and

helplessness, and the wrath of the gods.



The bible-peddlers like to tell us that an attack on their book is an attack

on the CREATOR. This is not so. They also like to say that an attack on the

biblical god is an attack on the CREATOR of the universe. This is another

baloney. The biblical god is Yahweh, also called Jehovah. Yahweh is a Jewish

tribal god. Let me explain. First, we have to ask who are the Jews?



All the historical, anthropological and archaeological evidence we have

today shows that Africans were the first people on earth. The Jews belong to

the so-called SEMITIC race. For those who do not know, SEMI means HALF. A

SEMITE is, by definition, half-African, half-white. In every Jewish vein

there flows some African blood - the same goes for the Arabs. So, brothers

and sisters, if we were the first people on earth, how do we explain the

Jewish giving us a god?



Those who read their bible properly will understand that before the

wandering seventy Hebrew went to settle in Egypt, they had no conception of

monotheism! Monotheism, for our still ignorant brothers, was an African

concept. It was Pharaoh Akhneton who conceptualized monotheism and wrote

many of the books falsely credited to Solomon. We read in the bible how the

Jews were worshipping several gods. Even after they left Egypt, they still

relapse to worshipping these different gods, whenever they are fed up with

Yahweh. How many instances in the bible did Yahweh had to warn them through

Moses, the Judges and the Kings that, 'I am your God, who brought you out of

Egypt?' Moses was brought up in the court of the pharaohs, it was just

jejune nonsense that he got his laws from mount sinai. It was another way of

denying Africans the credit that rightly belong to us! We shall be dealing

more with Moses in subsequent issues.



Among the people of the world, Africans are the most spiritual. That

explains why we remain eternal optimists. In the face of great adversity, we

keep going strong because we believe that the morrow will be brighter. This

is precisely what our oppressors throughout the ages know, and they are

using it against us. Anyone who know anything about religion could only be

amused by the sight of Euro-Americans going to teach spirituality to Africa.

The sight of the charlatans rushing to our land to teach 'universal human

compassion' should draw derision not anger. You and I live in Europe, where

do you find men who love one another? Where do you find men whose heart were

filled with christian charity? Where, in these hate-filled societies, do you

find people who love Africans? First, there is an important distinction to

be made between christians and what we shall call 'Bible-Peddlers,' or

'Bible-Zombies.'



It may distress a lot of our christian brothers, but the Bible has nothing

to do with Jesus the Christ. Jesus the Christ? Yes, Christ is a title and

not the surname of Jesus of Nazareth. What Jesus taught has nothing to do

with anything contained in the bible. Christianity as we know it today owes

its inspiration and creation to Saul alias Paul, who claimed to have an

epiphany on his way to Damascus. None of those credited with writing the

Gospels were eye-witnesses to what they were writing about. None of the

fables and legends they were plagiarizing came from the mouth of Jesus the

Christ.



The saddest part is that most christians today do not know that those whom

Jesus imparted his knowledge\teachings were overcame by Paul. And do our

christian brothers know that they are worshipping Paul's, and not Jesus'

teachings? If Paul had not, through the sheer force of his personality,

wrested control from the true apostles of Jesus, we would have a very

different christianity today. None of the Gospels we find in the New

Testament would have been included as they were all written by Paul

partisans. The picture we have of Jesus the Christ would also be very

different. The simple fact that the early Roman Catholic fathers compiled 73

booklets into their version of the bible while the protestants, an offshoot

of roman catholicism, compiled 68. Readers are directed to documents

relating to the Conference of Nicene in 325 AD.



When asked a question, our christian brothers are quick to say, 'According

to the holy Bible, blah, blah, blah.' Let us debunk this nonsense about a

Holy Bible. There are books in the world that could be declared sacred or

holy, but the christian bible is not one of them. A simple dictionary

definition of 'Holy' is 'endowed or invested with extreme purity.' Does the

christian bible meet this simple criteria?



The bible could be dismissed as a book of 'excessive war-mongering,

licentious pornography, debauched prostitution, debased immorality, slavery

of the highest degree and intolerance of the highest order. You can then

throw in fantastic legends and fabulous myths. You may also add extreme

contradiction and infantile fables.



These are very serious charges and we did not make them because we want to

impress you with some big grammar. Everything we write shall be adequately

substantiated.



There are many authorities we can cite to support what we are going to say

on the christians and their book, but since the bible is its own worst

enemy, we shall rely solely on quotation from therein. Sadly, whereas

authorities like St. Augustine (a black man who contributed a lot to the

building of the christian faith) expressed doubt about the authenticity of

some of the books of the bible, ('when I encounter in these books a

statement which seems to contradict reality, I am in no doubt that either

the Text is faulty or the translator has nor been faithful to the original,'

he wrote); and whereas honest western christian scholars expressed the same

intellectual skepticism; and whereas even the Second Vatican Council

(1962-1965) expressed contradictions in the Bible, our African

brothers\sisters are clinging, dogmatically to the literalness of the bible.

Africans are prepare to go to war to attest to the authenticity of the

bible. How sad! This is 1994, guys\gals!



Like most things they touch, Euro-Americans have turn religion into a set of

abstractions and touting this as the glory of mankind. As anyone except the

most ignorant and dogmatic christian knows, there are other religions in the

world dating back to antiquity. What the Euro-Americans are teaching as

christianity are nothing but crude copies of ancient religion, which unto

this day, they cannot fully understand.



In order to fully understand the bible, one has to read more than the bible.

There is no single original thought in the bible. The christian bible added

amost nothing to human knowledge. All its stories are found in the Egyptian

or the Chaldean ancient books. The psalms and songs of Solomon falsely

credited to the wrong people. There is no important idea contain in the

christian bible that is not found in the eschatology of the Egyptians.



It is important to make another distinction. This time between religion and

theology. Religion: 'worship of, or obedience to a supernatural

power.'Theology: 'the systematic study of christian revelation concerning

God's natural and purpose.' As can be clearly see, the christians are LYING

when they say that theirs is the only religion, the only vehicle to God.

Christianity is nothing but a theology, a crude vehicle to perpetuate White

Supremacy. I think it is only African christians who do not seem to see the

use to which christianity is being put to mentally enslaved us. Any honest

Euro-American christian scholar knows that the image of a caucasian Mary

with her baby Jesus is a pure invention.



How does this strike our christian brothers? Those of us still bowing to the

image of a caucasian maid and her son are bowing to a FALSE IMAGE. Mary and

her son could never have been blue-eyed blonde. They were Hebrew, and all

the records we have of the Hebrews did not pictured them as WHITE PEOPLE.

This alone should shattered the myth that proponents of christianity are

anything but cultural chauvinists, hell-bent of distorting reality,

enslaving the non-European, especially the African people of the world, and

promoting racial nonsense under the canopy of spreading the word of God. If

nothing else, these bible-peddlers are guilty of blasphemy by attributing to

God all their racial nonsense.



Before 1505, when Pope Julius II commissioned the Italian painter, Leonardo

da Vinci, to paint biblical personalities in white, Jesus and his mother

Mary were always portrayed as BLACK! You still find them in the Black

Madonnas in Poland, among other places. How do we explain this distortion?



'Jesus is the Son of God,' our christian brothers are fond of affirming? Is

this a new christian invention. At least three thousand years before Jesus,

the Egyptian Belief System has the idea of a Trinity. The biblical story of

Jesus was lifted verbatim from the Egyptian legend of the Cult of Isis. In

it were the story of the Virgin Isis and her son, Horus. What the compilers

of the bible did was merely to change Isis to Mary, and Horus to Jesus.

Shocked?



That was not all. All the myth about Jesus disappearing at age 12,

reappearing at age 30 and been crucified at age 33, on his arising on the

third day and ascending to heaven to sit on the right hand of his father are

exactly how the Egyptian told their legend of Horus.



The Yorubas are among the African ethnic\national group who said that they

came from Egypt, (the GAs in Ghana are a sub-tribe of the Yorubas, and they

left Ile-Ife to settle in their present abode), and anyone who know the

story of the fabled Yoruba king, Sango, will recognize the close resemblance

it bears to that of Jesus the Christ. Sango, according to the legend, was a

powerful king of Oyo, the political capital of the Yorubas, he was rejected

by his people and, as was the custom in those days, he had to commit

suicide. On the third day, he was storied to have arose and went up into

heaven?



It is not that these things are not known to modern scholars. There are

literary thousands of books that attest to all these historical facts. Why

are they not being told? Why are they not being taught at our seminaries,

our universities? Why are the liars, the forgers, the peddlers of

distortions being allowed to get away with these lies they claim were words

of God? Why is a plagiarized book full of stupid myths and patently false

legends being bandied as the HOLY BIBLE, inspired by almighty god? Why are

the governments in Africa allowing our culture to be contaminated by all

imperialists masquerading as men of God? Why is the false teachings of the

bible compulsory reading in our schools? We can spend the rest of our life

posing burning questions, but let us move on to our examination of this

Jesus thing.



The compilers of the bible want us to believe that their work was inspired

by God. Any work so inspired must, per definition, be FREE of errors,

omissions or contradictions. Is this true of the Bible? It is only the

irredeemably dogmatic christian who can claim so, unfortunately they are

mostly Africans.



It is blasphemous, to say the least, that a book that contain so numerous

errors and contradictions as the bible could be labeled 'Holy Bible,' and

falsely claimed to have been inspired by a God. The most gullible of these

christian brothers would even go as far as telling us that the words were

dictated word-for-word by God. This is simply outrageous! If only these

fellas will read their book properly, they will know that it cannot be the

handwork of a properly educated man, not to mentioned an almighty God! They

really don't know the amount of damage they are doing to their creed by that

stupid and patently false claim.



In trying to make Jesus the Christ fulfil their purpose of distortion, they

claimed for him a false genealogy to the Hebrew king David. On this

important score, one would have expected the writers to be extra-careful.

Were they? No, they weren't. Check out the genealogy in the Gospel according

to St. Matthew and compare it with that of St. Luke. The mistakes are that

which are common to all plagiarists.



According to our christian brothers, we have to believe that Matthew was

inspired to see 26 ancestors of Jesus - from his father, Joseph, to king

David. In the same Holy Book, Luke was equally inspired to see 41 ancestors

- also from Joseph to king David!



Matthew (Matt. 1:6-16 ) Luke (Luke 3:25-31)



1. Solomon Nathan

2. Rohoboam Mattatha

3. Abijah Menna

4. Asa Melca

5. Jehosopaphat Kliakim

6. Jehorom Jonam

7. Uzziah Joseph

8. Jotham Juda

9. Ahaz Simon

10. Hezekiah Levi

11. Manasseh Matthat

12. Amon Jorim

13. Josiah Eliezer

14. Jehoiachin Joshua

15. Shealtiel Er

16. Zerubbabel Elmadam

17. Abiud Cosam

18. Eliakim Addi

19. Azo Melchi

20. Zadok Neri

21. Achim Shealtiel

22. Eliud Zerubbabel

23. Eleazar Rheasa

24. Mathan Joanes

25. Jacob Juda

26. Joseph Joseph

27. Semein

28. Mattthias

29. Maath

30. Naggai

31. Esli

32. Nahum

33. Amos

34. Mattathias

35. Joseph

36. Jannai

37. Melchi

38. Levi

39. Matthat

40. Heli

41. Joseph



There you have it, fellow Africans. The bible-peddlers are going around the

world, disturbing our peace\sleep to tell these lies they claimed were

inspired by God! This is just a small part of the mountain of lies and

contradiction contained in the christian 'Holy Book.' What do you make of it?



We have to believe that it was inspired by God that Jesus was immaculately

conceived, yet we have to believe that, according to God inspiration, he was

a descendant of king David! Careful readers would have noted that Jesus

ancestry ended up with both Solomon and Nathan. For Christ sake, these two

men were brothers, from the same father. How could an inspired work claimed

that Jesus was the son of David through Solomon, and also claimed that he

was through Nathan, Solomon's brother! Does the word exist in any language

you know to express this contradiction?



massive greetings,