Executive Director of Global InfoAnalytics, Mussa Dankwah, has advised against what he describes as the politics of convenience that undermine the principles of democracy.

Mussa cautioned against actions that could jeopardise democratic progress, emphasising the need to preserve the dignity and respect of the president-elect, who has previously served his people well.

“This is a definite 'hell NO.' Don’t start this conversation. We don’t need politics of convenience. Don’t destroy a man who has proven to be a true democrat with this kind of idea,” he said.

He described John Mahama as a democrat who should not be encouraged to revise the constitution to enable him to serve two consecutive terms, citing examples of Rwandan President Paul Kagame and former President of Ivory Coast, Alassane Ouattara.

“He must serve his last term and leave with dignity and respect. He should not be encouraged to be like Ouattara and Kagame,” he stated in a post shared on Facebook.

The post read, “This is a definite 'hell NO.' Don’t start this conversation. We don’t need politics of convenience. Don’t destroy a man who has proven to be a true democrat with this kind of idea. He must serve his last term and leave with dignity and respect. He should not be encouraged to be like Ouattara and Kagame.”

His remarks were in response to a GhanaWeb publication suggesting that John Dramani Mahama may serve two consecutive terms.

See the earlier publication below:

John Mahama may serve two consecutive terms

The idea of President-elect John Dramani Mahama considering a constitutional amendment to serve two consecutive terms is gaining traction, despite warnings from his critics, including Professor Steven Adei, who caution against such a move.

However, what his critics fail to understand is that John Mahama is not driven by greed, unlike some of them. While he may not be perfect, he has consistently demonstrated a sense of integrity and statesmanship over the years. If he chooses to amend the constitution, it will likely be driven by his vision for Ghana, and there's little his critics can do to change that.

Ghanaians gave him a resounding victory, with an overwhelming majority in Parliament, empowering him to take bold actions for the betterment of the country, free from interference from his opponents. The most important factor is for him to meet the expectations of the people.

If he does so, Ghanaians will likely encourage him to continue his work. But knowing John Mahama, it’s unlikely he will alter the constitution purely for personal gain. He is not like some of his opponents who view the country as their personal possession to be handed down through generations.

If he performs well in the next four years, it would be wise for Ghanaians to consider a referendum to allow him to extend his tenure. After all, what is the purpose of a resounding victory if not to allow the elected leader to make meaningful progress and put things right?

Personally, I would support the idea of a referendum to let him serve two consecutive terms, as he has proven his capability. Ghana is fortunate to have him as President. In any case, those who remained silent during the tenure of President Nana Akufo-Addo, even when his government faltered, should maintain the same stance now.

John Mahama does not need their hypocritical advice. The only people who have the right to criticise or hold the President-elect accountable are those who were vocal about their dissatisfaction with the current government. They should not expect to have the same influence over John Mahama as they did when he served as President from 2012 to 2016. His supporters will not tolerate partisan or biased individuals attempting to undermine the President-elect.


RAD/MA