Opinions of Saturday, 11 November 2017

Columnist: Samson Lardy Anyenini

Samson’s Take: RTI - don’t politicians lie when they claim to serve citizens?

Samson Lardy Anyenini, writer play videoSamson Lardy Anyenini, writer

I have always disagreed with the popular view that brands all politicians as liars. But I confess it is becoming extremely difficult for me to take any politician by his word. I still think, sincerely, there are a few who see political leadership as service to the people rather than as a game and only for their private gain.

There is one small piece of law that needs to be passed on the back of provisions of the Constitution including article 21 (f) to properly empower and detail how people can access information on what is done with their tax money, etc.

It will help them properly lawfully question how things done on their behalf are actually done and also equip them to do their article 41 (f) duty requiring them “to protect and preserve public property and expose and combat misuse and waste of public funds and property.”

But what our leaders have done since the start of this Fourth Republic has been to promise to pass the Right To Information Law. The John Kufour regime spoke about it. The John Mills regime took it to Parliament but never passed it. The John Mahama regime returned it to Parliament, he personally pledged even before the international community that it would be passed and Speaker Doe Adjaho told us same. Candidate Akufo-Addo said he will pass it.

Vice President Dr. Bawumia in January 2017 said he would have RTI passed within the first 100 days if he could. In July 2017, President Akufo-Addo repeated his claim commitment to pass it. The Bill is back in Parliament and you have heard the lame excuses given by leaders as to the delay in passing something that has long been a ready-made product.

Surprisingly or rather unsurprisingly the Bill is not part of bills tabled for the final session of Parliament this year. See? Civil Society and especially the media which should be giving priority pressure has gone to sleep and left this job to the RTI Coalition.

My Take this morning is to fully adopt and share with you a statement by OccupyGhana demanding timelines for the passage of the RTI Bill. Here it is: OCCUPYGHANA®? PRESS STATEMENT

OCCUPYGHANA®? DEMANDS OUTLINE FOR PASSAGE OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION BILL OccupyGhana®? is deeply concerned that there do not appear to be any clear or discernible plans to pass the Right to Information Bill into law. Despite numerous Government assurances that the Bill will be passed “this year,” “very soon” or in the “next session” of Parliament, no clear timetable has emerged.

The inexcusably long delay by successive governments under the Fourth Republican Constitution to pass this law suggests to us that governments are simply afraid to pass a law that will help actualise a right that the Constitution has already given to Ghanaians. Unless and until the law is passed, Ghanaians are entitled to conclude that governments will seek any and every excuse to defer the passage of this law for as long as possible.

OccupyGhana®? is gratified that the courts have held that the right to information does not require an Act of Parliament to be exercised. Yet there remain substantive and procedural impediments to the exercise of this right. The current ‘default’ position of government departments is to either refuse or simply not answer any request for information. This forces citizens to go to court every time they seek to exercise that right. This is unacceptable and has to be addressed to ensure a straightforward and low cost system for the public to be able to enforce requests for information.

OccupyGhana®? therefore demands from the government and Parliament, a clear timetable for the passage of this law. This timetable should take cognisance of the commendable public engagement process for the Office of Special Prosecutor Bill, and set firm dates by which:

1. the government will publish and gazette the Bill;

2. the Bill shall be tabled for debate in Parliament and

3. the Parliamentary Select Committee on Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary affairs shall conclude its deliberations on the Bill. OccupyGhana®? expects that the Bill, when passed into law, will set out the clear parameters and instances where the government will exercise public interest privilege (this is the privilege that allows government to refuse the disclosure of a document or information which is against the public interest.) The current wide-bound interpretation of the government on this privilege is, in our view, the greatest substantive and procedural hurdle to the full realisation of the right to information. Any law that does not deal with this matter in a manner that eases the right to information would be worthless and not have been worth the wait.

OccupyGhana®? proposes that the mechanism of a truly Independent Commissioner with the power to determine disputes over public interest privilege would be the single most straightforward means of resolving any current impasse over this issue. An Information Commissioner using a highly simplified and swift process with limited scope for hearings and procedural delays would address concerns about the conflict between public disclosure and privilege. Any disputes over the Commissioner’s determination may be resolved by the Court, on narrow grounds akin to judicial review.

In conclusion, the continued delay in passing this Bill, which is now 18 years old, cannot and should not be accepted one jot further by the Ghanaian people.

Yours, for God & Country,

OccupyGhana

Samson Lardy ANYENINI

November 11, 2017