Today, the illegal artisanal mining called galamsey has become a menace and an existential threat to the Republic of Ghana.
What started as a source of livelihood for many young Ghanaians and an income stream for the government has become a scar in the conscience of the highest echelons of political leadership due to the devastating impacts it has had on human lives, health and environmental resources.
One may ask, why are we here?
In the 1990s the quest for diversifying the Ghanaian economy to broaden its income stream saw the enactment of legal instruments for issuing licenses for artisanal miners to engage in small-scale mining operations.
The artisanal miners were to exist side by side with large-scale mining concessioners; in some cases feeding off from ‘old’ concessions.
Operating under a controlled environment, subscribing to the rule of laws, respecting concession boundaries, managing environmental impacts and operating within the confines of the social requirements of communities of operations, artisanal mining became one of the surest ways to boost small-scale and medium enterprises within the natural resources sector. A very lucrative but fine businesses then.
Then, artisanal mining became something else when it metamorphosed its name to ‘Galamsey’ following the involvement of political stalwarts and highly cash-handed Chinese businessmen and women who came in with funds and capacity for massive extraction of minerals symptomatic of pillaging.
The Galamseyers targeted all possible sources of gold- forest estates, cocoa farms, agricultural farms steads, watersheds and river sources.
By 2016, the supply chains on the market had become extremely sophisticated with untouchable players.
The players include powerful licensed agents and issuers, highly connected politicians, wealthy Chinese businessmen, mayors, parliamentarians, community elders, members of the security sector and some traditional chiefs.
To the extent that even the pronouncements of the president of the republic that he was placing his presidency on the line marshalling the security forces as the commander in chief of the armed forces did not deter the players of the supply chain.
Today, Galamsey has gravely destroyed all of our major rivers that supply fishery and water resources to over 15 million population of Ghanaians. Especially rivers pra and offin have attained toxic levels too dangerous for consumption by WHO standards.
These rivers contain metalloids, such as lead, cadmium, copper, arsenic, mercury, iron, and zinc, making them unsuitable for domestic use.
The tributaries of these rivers have carried these pollutants all over the country affecting river streams in several regions including now Greater Accra region.
As a result, Ghana is facing significant challenges related to access to clean water. About 25% of the population lacks access to clean water, and the country is moving towards water stress.
In addition to diminishing water access, the health impacts of galamsey are dreadful.
Some of the physical health impacts are (i)Mercury poisoning including exposure to mercury used in gold extraction causes neurological damage, kidney damage, and birth defects; (ii) heavy metal contamination. Lead, arsenic, and cadmium in water and soil cause various health issues, including cancer, respiratory problems, and organ damage; (iii) Waterborne diseases. Polluted water sources lead to increased risk of cholera, typhoid, and diarrhoea; (iv) Respiratory problems including dust and chemical exposure cause respiratory issues, such as silicosis and bronchitis.
With soils contaminated by toxic metals, Ghana will be threatened by food insecurity. Already the country has not recovered from post-COVID food production impacts as well as recent effects of climate variability. Recent evidence of heavy metal presence in cocoa beans and food products such as yams and cassava points to the looming grave consequences of staples shortages for the country.
In essence, what are citizens going to do? Are we going to rely a hundred percent on food imports? This is a possibility with serious ramifications for foreign exchange and the ever-depreciating cedi currency.
Further, the impact on environmental resources cannot be overstated. Contaminated river bodies and soils meant that a wide spectrum of biodiversity would have been destroyed. These may include food chains and habitats of rare, endangered and indigenous species of all categories.
Destruction of forest estates would have devastating effects on high conservation value species and the utter destruction of Ghana’s genetic heat indices.
Some of the forest estates might become so destroyed beyond reparations and recovery, affecting Ghana’s overall contribution to climate action and the preservation of global biodiversity.
How can we solve the galamsey problem once and for all? I propose a number of ways including bold policy options and punitive measures to deter reoccurrence. The solutions are set out as follows. Firstly, ban artisanal/galamsey mining indefinitely.
This will allow for time to review its licensing schemes and analyze additional requirements to include to safeguard the impacts of activities on environmental resources. The ban will also help to review the players to be allowed to engage in the scheme in the future as well as what equipment to allow for the mining activities. It is proposed that future licensing should prohibit the use of excavators and other sophisticated equipment. Also non-Ghanaian players especially the Chinese must not be permitted to engage in the trade.
Secondly, name and shame all political players including members of parliament currently seeking re-election in the current electoral processes. It is proposed that such MPs or politicians must be completely banned from engaging in future politics, even if they get re-elected. This punitive measure is important to deter such irresponsible behaviour of any category of political leaders.
Thirdly, there must be a robust analysis of beneficiaries of the value and supply chains of the traded Galamsey gold to force the return of at least 80% of some of the money to be put in a trust fund for use to correct the impacts. The value and supply chain participants must be liable to jailable offences under the country’s rules of law. A strong case could be made for criminal acts involving willful destruction of the nation’s environmental resources as well as causing wanton health problems to a significant Ghanaian population akin to population decimation. Pursuing this case will make Ghana look serious.
Fourthly, engage in a rapid assessment of the extent of damage to environmental resources including effects on human health and production systems to design an imminent program for redress. The analysis should include the extent of coverage including geospatial distribution of farmlands and communities affected by the crisis. Once the special distribution is determined, this information must be made available publicly with a command to stop any food production from these regions. Essentially, there must be a seclusion of agricultural foods including inland fisheries from the local food distribution supply chain. This ban must be enforced until such time as the environment is cleaned.
Lastly, engage science and technology solutions for cleaning the water sources, decontamination of soils and restoring the ecological integrity of our ecosystems. The technological solution exists to destroy the man-made chemicals (per-fluorinate substances-PFAs) and the metalloids to clean the waters and soils of these substances. However, the exercise is very expensive and could cost several billions of dollars to do so. However, the good news is that the solution and expertise exist that we can tap into. Besides, the cleaning process would engage human capacities which would create jobs for Ghanaians including some of those who have engaged in the Galamsey in the first place.
With the above commonsensical solutions, I believe that we will be able to deal effectively with the prevailing Galamsey situation addressing its existential threats to the nation.