Justice Srem Sai, a legal academic and practitioner, has raised concerns over the Electoral Commission's (EC) alleged alteration of certified parliamentary results in certain constituencies. He's calling for legal action to be taken against the commission, sparking a debate about the sanctity of election results and their implications on Ghana's democracy.

Srem Sai argues that once results are certified and declared, the EC doesn't have the authority to unilaterally amend them. He believes such actions undermine the credibility of elections and pose a threat to Ghana's democratic process. The legal expert emphasizes the importance of legal scrutiny in upholding electoral laws and ensuring transparency and accountability in governance.

The debate surrounding the EC's handling of election results comes at a critical time, as Ghana prepares for the 2024 elections. Critics fear that the alleged alterations of certified results could sow seeds of discontent and create a breeding ground for electoral disputes.

The Electoral Commission has yet to respond to Srem Sai's criticisms, and it remains to be seen whether any legal action will be taken against the commission. However, the discussion sparked by Srem Sai's remarks underscores the need for vigilance and adherence to legal processes in safeguarding the integrity of Ghana's electoral system.

In the recent 2024 Ghanaian general election, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) candidate, John Mahama, won the presidential election with 56.55% of the votes, while the New Patriotic Party (NPP) candidate, Mahamudu Bawumia, secured 41.61% of the votes . The NDC also won a landslide victory in the parliamentary elections, securing 182 out of 276 seats.