This blog is managed by the content creator and not GhanaWeb, its affiliates, or employees. Advertising on this blog requires a minimum of GH₵50 a week. Contact the blog owner with any queries.

Mercy360 Blog of Wednesday, 27 November 2024

Source: Mercy Mensah

Kwaku Azar weighs in on the mixed outcomes of the Reverend Kusi Boateng case, as CHRAJ clears him but refers the National Cathedral's Board to the OSP and AG.

Comments (1)

  • Share:
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter

Kwaku Azar has raised some critical questions about the dual identity case involving Reverend Kusi Boateng and the National Cathedral project. Essentially, Azar is highlighting the conflicting findings between the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) and the judiciary.

CHRAJ cleared Reverend Kusi Boateng of any ethical violations, but the courts seem to be pointing to potential legal violations. This discrepancy has left many wondering about the integrity of Ghana's accountability systems.

What's even more interesting is that CHRAJ has referred the National Cathedral's Board of Trustees to the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) and the Attorney General (AG) for further investigation and possible prosecution. Azar is emphasizing the need for coherence in handling such cases and the importance of these referrals.

For Azar, this case represents larger governance issues, particularly regarding the management of high-profile national projects like the National Cathedral. He's calling for institutional alignment to ensure fairness and transparency, emphasizing that the public deserves clarity and justice.