Zeqblog Blog of Wednesday, 11 December 2024
Source: Okine Isaac
Joyce Bawah Mogtari, a major member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and Special Aide to President-elect John Dramani Mahama, has hinted at revisiting Ghana's 1992 Constitution. In an interview with ChannelOne TV, she disclosed that Mahama would soon address the nation, outlining the constitutional review and amendment process.
According to YEN, According to Mogtari, the NDC's success in the 2024 elections, combined with its strong majority in Parliament, creates a unique chance to pursue reforms that many Ghanaians have long pushed for. "Now, we have the supreme majority in Parliament, and this is something that every single Ghanaian is looking forward to," she told me.
Several concerned groups, including the University Teachers' Association of Ghana (UTAG), have advocated for modifications to the 1992 Constitution. Strengthening state institutions is central to their campaign for good governance, inclusivity, and sustainable development. Despite these calls, both the previous and current administrations have failed to solve the issue.
Joyce Bawah Mogtari's words indicate the NDC's intention to prioritize constitutional revisions during Mahama's government. However, she did not specify which aspects of the Constitution would be reconsidered.
The announcement has sparked mixed reactions among Ghanaians. Some welcomed the move, citing the need for institutional independence and modern governance structures. A commenter, @Mani_Osei, wrote, “Amendment of the Constitution for independence of some institutions is all we ask for. We can't continue like this.”
Others, however, expressed caution, emphasizing that political power is transient. A user, @Danzak355, warned, “POLITICAL POWER IS TRANSIENT. LET'S TREAD CAUTIOUSLY.”
As Ghanaians await President-elect Mahama's presentation, the possibility of constitutional modifications represents a watershed moment in the country's government. The NDC's emphasis on reforms may bring about long-overdue changes, but it also raises worries about the balance of power and the inclusiveness of the review process.