"What protection teaches us is to do to ourselves in time of peace what enemies seek to do to us in time of war"- Henry George (Protection and Free Trade 1886, p.169)
?Trade Justices? have reviewed the bedlam of the poor. The issue is Africans are poor. Their rule is protectionism promotes progress. In applying the rule to the issue, a verdict is reached- that free trade is so bad that its festering sore transcend Aids, drought, hunger and tsunamis leaving in its wake dislodged economies. A growing number of potential ?jurors? from rock stars to the clergy are now in their fold.
Unfortunately, reality and logic are lost in the emotive and overly humane passion these latter day apostolate of trade justice seem to be preaching. Trade is a positive sum game, not a zero sum as has been bandied about by anti-free traders. All parties gain!
True, primary economic activity is the mainstay of many poor economies. The deranged EU and US agricultural policies prevent access to their markets. When they do open up, they pay absurd prices for our produce. So ?Trade Justices? have suggested the erection of prohibitive tariffs on imports. This may seem plausible, but they never work. Nigeria slapped over 110pc tariffs on imported rice but more Nigerians patronized imported rice for two simple reasons. First, the protected local price was still higher than the imported rice. Secondly, local production capacity could not meet the increasing demand. In my country Ghana, the Poultry Farmers Association on May16, 2005 took government to court seeking a relief to compel them to impose 20 pc additional tariffs on imported poultry products.
Rather than continue to create protected local monopolies that will lord shoddy goods and hiked prices over poor people, even rent-seeking bureaucrats are beginning to see the absurdity in imposing tariffs, at least in Ghana. They reckon that the poor will need to spend a portion of their meagre resources on cheap but quality products, save the rest to invest in other economic activities. They also know that the import sector employs a far greater number of people than our small holder subsistence farmers who sing the unsavoury notes of ?rigged trade rules? ?Trade Justices? want to hear.
Just because it is difficult to trade with some countries does not mean you can?t trade with others. Multi lateral trade agreements are not so sacrosanct? Ghana?s largest trade partners are the UK, US and Japan the kingpins of farmer subsidy. Yet, Ghana?s annual turnover from trade with Zambia for instance, is only US$50,000 and there aren?t non-reducible barriers in south-south relations? It is just institutionalised inertia that has taken the better part of leaders as for three decades they have paid lip service to regional integration. Their inaction has given custom officials and illegal militias field day to erect hundreds of road barriers on international routes. So it will take you almost three days to get to Lagos from Accra if you want to avoid bribes and transact good business. Air travel is best but very expensive because of over regulation of the sector. It?s outrageous to pay an average of USD 350 for an hour?s flight from Accra to Lagos when the same mileage in Europe could be as low as 2 Pounds on Ryen Air.
Besides, the theory of comparative advantage used to strictly apply when man depended on natural raw materials. Not anymore with technological advancement in our now globalized world. Hong Kong, hardly an empty place when it was found rose to become the most prosperous and freest economy. When Hong Kong?s industries faced international competition, producers did not run to government for protection, instead they moved on to other sectors. China, the amazing growing giant had been pillaged for running a closed economy for years but then realised the benefit of trade liberalization and opened up by joining the WTO. Today anti-free traders in Europe and America stare in awe China?s strides, especially in the textiles industry and wish the Multi Fibre Agreement was not abrogated. In Ghana, a cunning way to shrug off the competition from the Far East is a creation of an Economic Intelligence Task Force to monitor importers of alleged inferior textiles. Interestingly the task force?s vision of an equitable textile trade excludes the lamentations of local manufacturers who cite the punitive tax regime, the high cost of capital and exorbitant utility charges as the main barriers.
Perhaps Africa?s transition will be a lot easier if the EU sheds off its common agricultural policy to Africa where labour is cheap with vast expanse of fertile land. First though, local reforms that free up entrepreneurial spirit and capital are needed. In Africa: Open for Business, a one-hour documentary on doing business in Africa, Carol Pineau a CNN journalist unearths the successes, struggles and challenges African entrepreneurs face. From a tiny caf? operator in Kampala to a major flower exporter in Kenya, Carol acknowledges that corruption, entry barriers and poor infrastructure are a few of the massive destructive icebergs entrepreneurs cope with. According to Carol, one of her interviewees worries very little about corruption and entry barriers because in his country, Somalia there is no one whole unit called government.
More people are getting convinced that limited and decentralized good governance, which thrives on transparency, the rule of law, enforceable contracts, free speech, defined, defendable and divestible property rights and free markets are the way to go.
To accept the verdict of the ?Trade Justices? is to overlook deficits of the above institutions and reward poverty and stagnation.
Views expressed by the author(s) do not necessarily reflect those of GhanaHomePage.
